INTERNATIONAL — April 9, 2026
Pakistan PM Proposes Ceasefire Between US and Iran Ahead of Trump Deadline
Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif proposed a two-week ceasefire between the US and Iran via social media just before Donald Trump's deadline expired. Reports differ on whether Trump agreed and on the proposal's origins, with some citing mediation efforts and others suggesting it was pre-prepared by the US or Israel.
The Ehtebar Desk — originates with Amu TV — corroborated by Hurriyat — 2 min read
Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif proposed a two-week ceasefire between the United States and Iran in a social media post on X just before a deadline set by U.S. President Donald Trump expired.
Amu TV reported, citing TASS, that Trump agreed to the proposal and that US-Iran talks are scheduled for April 10 in Islamabad, focusing on the Strait of Hormuz and regional security. The outlet said Iran's Foreign Minister guaranteed safe passage through the strait during the ceasefire. It described the move as driven by Pakistan's domestic, border and alliance interests, with indirect support from China, easing tensions and lowering oil prices while positioning Pakistan as a mediator.
Hurriyat, citing The New York Times, said Sharif suddenly posted requesting an extension as the deadline expired. It quoted Forbes analysts suggesting the message was pre-prepared by the U.S. or Israel, with a draft visible, amid suspicions that Pakistan's regime is aiding efforts to oust Tehran with Washington and Jerusalem's support.
The sources agree on Sharif's public proposal for a ceasefire or extension amid US-Iran tensions tied to Trump's deadline but differ on its intent and outcome. Amu TV presented it as genuine diplomatic mediation, while Hurriyat portrayed it as an effort to please Trump.
Read the original reporting at Amu TV →
Reliability assessment
Both sources corroborate the core event of Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif publicly proposing a ceasefire/extension to Trump just before the deadline (Amu TV cites TASS; Hurriyat cites NYT/Forbes). Differing interpretations of intent and unconfirmed outcomes do not negate the corroborated proposal.
The source language mixes facts with framing or advocacy wording. Hurriyat: "Pakistan regime" – uses 'regime' instead of 'government' to delegitimize; "seeking to oust Tehran" – speculative conspiracy framing Pakistan as betraying Iran; "suddenly" – implies suspicious, orchestrated timing.
Independent web corroboration
A separate web search returned 8 matching reports. A selection:
Pakistan has emerged as a key ... States <strong>to secure a temporary ceasefire and host negotiations to end the war in the Middle East. On Wednesday, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said the United States and Iran had agreed to a ceasefire "everywhere" following mediation by his government</strong>...
- Pakistan’s Mediation of US-Iran Ceasefire Shows Central Role in Global Politics - Bloombergbloomberg.com
As US President Donald Trump’s deadline approached for Iran to reach a ceasefire or face “all hell,” Pakistan emerged as a key mediator <strong>to help deliver a two-week pause in fighting</strong>.
Analysts attribute this transformation to <strong>a combination of geographic necessity, deft diplomacy, and shifting regional alliances</strong>. Together, these factors have transformed Pakistan into an indispensable mediator, elevating the country’s profile ...
Pakistan’s role as a key mediator between the United States and Iran followed months of <strong>cultivating ties with the Trump administration and years of building deep bonds with Iran</strong>, enabling it to place itself at the center of efforts to resolve ...
Across the newsrooms
Where reports agree
- Shehbaz Sharif made a public proposal/request for ceasefire/extension between US and Iran just before Trump's deadline
- The proposal relates to US-Iran tensions involving a Trump-set deadline
Where reports differ
- Genuine diplomatic mediation by Pakistan (Amu TV) vs. effort to please Trump, possibly scripted by US/Israel (Hurriyat)
- Trump agreed with negotiations set vs. no confirmation of agreement
- Positive outcomes like oil price drop, ships passing, China's role (Amu TV) vs. no such details (Hurriyat)
Filed by 2 outlets
Amu TV
Originating
Reported straight
Reported straight
Hurriyat
Framed
Framed
Filed under
International — Pakistan, Shehbaz Sharif, Donald Trump, Iran, US-Iran tensions
Spotted an error or have more on this story? Tip the desk on Telegram → or WhatsApp →.
Reader supported
Keep Ehtebar running
Every published story uses paid tools to translate reporting, compare sources, extract claims, and produce a clearer read on Afghanistan. Reader support helps keep that work independent.
€5
helps cover daily verification runs
€15
supports a week of source comparison
€50
keeps independent analysis moving
More in International
European Parliament Approves Resolution Urging Sanctions on Taliban Leaders
— Reliable
European Social Democrats Call EU Engagement with Taliban a Mistake
— Reliable
Afghan Taekwondo Athlete Ehsam Rahimi Wins Opening Match but Loses to Uzbek Opponent at Asian Championships
— Reliable
Turkish Police Detain 15 Afghan Refugees in Two Cities
— Reliable