POLITICS — March 3, 2026

Pakistan's Strained Relations with Afghanistan and Neighbors

Hasht-e Subh analysis claims Pakistan, born of colonial designs, maintains hostile relations with all neighbors and struggles to control the Taliban, now aligned with its rivals Russia, Iran, and India.

The Ehtebar Desk — originates with Hasht-e Subh2 min read

Pakistan's Strained Relations with Afghanistan and Neighbors
Image courtesy Hasht-e Subh

Hasht-e Subh describes Pakistan as an artificial state formed from territories detached from India and Afghanistan, leading to ongoing territorial disputes with both neighbors. Afghanistan opposed Pakistan's United Nations membership at its inception, viewing it as a continuation of British divide-and-rule policies in the region.

The analysis highlights persistent tensions due to Afghanistan's non-recognition of the Durand Line as its official border and India's rejection of Kashmir's separation. These frictions have hindered lasting stability in South Asia, with both Pakistan and Afghanistan seeking opportunities to undermine each other. Pakistan is said to have consistently supported opponents of Afghan governments, aiming to prevent the emergence of a strong central authority in Afghanistan.

Over the past four decades, events in Afghanistan enabled greater Pakistani influence, with both mujahideen groups and the Taliban serving as instruments for Pakistan's strategic objectives. The Taliban, in particular, are portrayed as having reversed Afghanistan's progress through rulings from Pakistani clerics. However, current challenges persist even under Taliban rule, as the group has fragmented into factions, complicating Islamabad's control. Parts of the Taliban are reportedly aligned with Pakistan's rivals, including countries seeking to use Afghan territory against Pakistan or to access Central Asia via instability channeled through Pakistan.

Pakistan is characterized as inherently destabilizing, lacking stable friendly ties with neighbors: overt enmity with India, support for Baloch separatists alongside alignment with U.S. and Israeli ventures against Iran, and ambitions viewing Afghanistan as 'strategic depth.' Relations with China are described as ostensibly close but involving duplicity. Specifically on Afghanistan-Pakistan ties, the piece argues that unlike the Taliban's first rule, the group now operates beyond Pakistan's plans, gravitating toward strategic interests of Russia, Iran, and India—nations with grievances against Pakistan.

These countries are said to position Afghanistan as a security belt, using the Taliban as a security firm to entangle Pakistan in Afghan geography, neutralizing its adventurism. Recent Taliban-Pakistan tensions are framed as outcomes of intricate intelligence operations designed to mire Pakistan in an Afghan quagmire. Pakistan and Western allies, including Britain, are aware and have sought to retain control over the Taliban. The analysis notes a large Pashtun population on the Afghan side of the border.

Read the original reporting at Hasht-e Subh

Reliability assessment

Single opinion/analysis piece lacking concrete, checkable details, named attributions, or independent corroboration; relies on speculative geopolitical interpretations without evidence.

The source language tilts sensational, leaning on hyperbole or charged phrasing. Title 'Pakistan in the Afghan Vortex' uses dramatic vortex metaphor for entrapment; describes Pakistan as 'artificial country' 'designed to be a factor of tension'; alleges 'complex intelligence plans' to 'trap Pakistan in a quagmire called Afghanistan,' employing conspiratorial hyperbole and emotional framing.

Across the newsrooms

Filed by

Filed under

PoliticsPakistan, Afghanistan, Taliban, India, Iran

Spotted an error or have more on this story? Tip the desk on Telegram → or WhatsApp →.

Reader supported

Keep Ehtebar running

Every published story uses paid tools to translate reporting, compare sources, extract claims, and produce a clearer read on Afghanistan. Reader support helps keep that work independent.

€5

helps cover daily verification runs

€15

supports a week of source comparison

€50

keeps independent analysis moving