INTERNATIONAL — March 21, 2026
US Judge Blocks Pentagon Policy Restricting Press Access, Sides with New York Times
A U.S. federal judge ruled against a Trump administration policy restricting journalists' Pentagon access, siding with The New York Times and ordering reinstatement of credentials for seven of its reporters within one week. The decision found the policy violated the First and Fifth Amendments.
The Ehtebar Desk — originates with Pajhwok — 2 min read

WASHINGTON (Afghan Verified) -- A federal judge in the United States blocked a policy under the Trump administration that restricted journalists' access to the Pentagon, ruling it violated the First and Fifth Amendments.
U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington, D.C., issued the decision Friday in favor of The New York Times, which sued the Pentagon and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in December. The newspaper argued the policy infringed on freedom of speech and due process.
Friedman found the policy unlawfully restricted press credentials for journalists who did not comply with new rules. He concluded it amounted to viewpoint discrimination, aimed at excluding "undesirable" journalists and favoring those aligned with the government.
The judge stressed that press freedom is essential to national security and public awareness, particularly during periods of heightened U.S. tensions from conflicts and geopolitical strains.
Friedman ordered the Pentagon to reinstate credentials for seven New York Times journalists within one week and to demonstrate compliance.
A New York Times spokesperson welcomed the ruling, stating it safeguards core principles of a free press and ensures the public remains informed about government actions and military operations.
The Pentagon had defended the policy as necessary to protect sensitive national security information and bar access by individuals deemed security risks. Lawyers for The New York Times countered that it was intended to suppress critical reporting on the administration.
Read the original reporting at Pajhwok →
Reliability assessment
Single source (Pajhwok) provides concrete, checkable details: named judge (Paul Friedman, Washington D.C.), named defendant (Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth), specific lawsuit timing (December), constitutional amendments cited, exact orders (seven journalists, one week compliance). Qualifies as reliable per guidelines for single-source with direct attribution.
The source language reads straight.
Across the newsrooms
Filed by
Pajhwok
Originating
Reported straight
Reported straight
Filed under
International — New York Times, Pentagon, Paul Friedman, Pete Hegseth, press freedom
Spotted an error or have more on this story? Tip the desk on Telegram → or WhatsApp →.
Reader supported
Keep Ehtebar running
Every published story uses paid tools to translate reporting, compare sources, extract claims, and produce a clearer read on Afghanistan. Reader support helps keep that work independent.
€5
helps cover daily verification runs
€15
supports a week of source comparison
€50
keeps independent analysis moving
More in International

Experts Discuss Regional Stability and Economic Ties at Kabul Meeting
— Reliable

Zalmay Khalilzad Says Tense Kabul-Islamabad Relations Hinder Afghan-Trans Project
— Reliable

G7 Leaders Pledge Increased Military Aid to Ukraine and New Sanctions on Russia
— Reliable

Family of Afghan Refugee Demands Accountability Over Death in US Immigration Custody
— Reliable