POLITICS — April 18, 2026
UK Special Envoy Labels Taliban Criminal Court Decree 'Unjust,' Urges Revocation
The UK special envoy for Afghanistan has called the Taliban's Decree Twelve on criminal courts unjust and repressive, urging its revocation in line with a UN experts' letter to the Taliban that highlighted serious human rights shortcomings.
The Ehtebar Desk — originates with Amu TV — corroborated by Hasht-e Subh — 2 min read

The United Kingdom's special envoy for Afghanistan has criticized the Taliban's Decree Twelve regulating criminal court procedures as unjust and repressive, calling for its revocation.
Richard Lindsay referenced a letter sent on the tenth of April by UN human rights experts to Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi. The letter raised more than twenty legal questions about the decree and warned that it is incompatible with international human rights standards.
The UN experts stated that the decree lacks fundamental fair trial guarantees, including the presumption of innocence, the right to a defense lawyer and effective appeals. They cited a lack of transparency, vague definitions of crimes and the potential to undermine equality before the law and protection from torture. The concerns could lead to arbitrary enforcement against activists, religious minorities and other vulnerable groups.
The decree took effect in January and was drafted without reference to Afghanistan's previous constitution or recognized legislative processes.
It has also been criticized for provisions that recognize slavery, accuse followers of other religions of heresy, permit husbands to beat wives to the point of breaking bones and exacerbate human rights violations against religious minorities.
Lindsay stressed that the decree must be repealed to ensure respect for human rights for all Afghans.
Read the original reporting at Amu TV →
Reliability assessment
Two independent Afghan media outlets corroborate the core event of the named UK Special Envoy issuing a public statement (on X/social media) criticizing Taliban Decree 12 on criminal courts, referencing a UN experts' letter, and calling for revocation while stressing human rights. The verifiable fact that the envoy made this statement is concrete and attributable. Detail variations (specific concerns highlighted, exact decree impacts) are normal in multi-source reporting and do not undermine the reliability of the shared core claims.
The source language mixes facts with framing or advocacy wording. Hasht-e Subh: "repressive decree" (سرکوبگرانه) frames Taliban policy with negative emotional loading; "suppresses religious minorities" uses advocacy phrasing implying unjust oppression; details like recognizing slavery and permitting bone-breaking beatings add charged moral judgment.
Independent web corroboration
An independent web search turned up no separate corroborating reports. Treat the account as single-sourced until more outlets pick it up.
Across the newsrooms
Where reports agree
- The UK Special Envoy for Afghanistan criticized the Taliban's criminal court decree and called for it to be revoked.
- UN human rights experts have expressed serious concerns about the decree in a letter to the Taliban and warned of negative impacts on human rights.
- Human rights must be respected for all Afghans in relation to this decree.
Where reports differ
- Variation in the spelling of the UK envoy's name (Richard Landy vs. Richard Lindsay) and characterization of the decree (unjust vs. repressive).
- Amu TV emphasizes fair trial deficiencies, lack of presumption of innocence, transparency issues, and risks to civil society, while Hasht-e Subh focuses on slavery, religious heresy accusations, suppression of minorities, and permission for severe domestic violence.
- Only Amu TV reports the decree's effective date (January), the letter's specific date (10 April), leadership by Richard Bennett, and detailed incompatibility with international law; Hasht-e Subh mentions over 20 legal questions from experts.
Filed by 2 outlets
Amu TV
Originating
Reported straight
Reported straight
Hasht-e Subh
Framed
Framed
Filed under
Politics — Taliban, UK Special Envoy, Decree 12, UN Human Rights Experts, Human Rights Violations
Spotted an error or have more on this story? Tip the desk on Telegram → or WhatsApp →.
Reader supported
Keep Ehtebar running
Every published story uses paid tools to translate reporting, compare sources, extract claims, and produce a clearer read on Afghanistan. Reader support helps keep that work independent.
€5
helps cover daily verification runs
€15
supports a week of source comparison
€50
keeps independent analysis moving
More in Politics

Rahmatullah Nabil Says UN Reports Challenge Taliban Legitimacy if True
— Reliable

UK Parliament to Debate Concerns over Pro-Israel Influence in British Politics
— Reliable

Mawlawi Abdul Kabir Emphasizes Unity and Coordination Between Government Institutions and People
— Reliable

Taliban Close Health Institute and Ban SIM Card Sales to Women in Bamyan
— Developing