INTERNATIONAL — April 28, 2026
US Officials Express Dissatisfaction With Iran’s Proposal to Delay Nuclear Talks
U.S. officials report dissatisfaction with Iran’s latest diplomatic proposal, which seeks to delay nuclear negotiations until Persian Gulf maritime disputes are resolved. Washington maintains that addressing Tehran’s nuclear program remains a primary requirement for any agreement.
The Ehtebar Desk — originates with ToloNews — corroborated by Khaama Press — 2 min read

U.S. officials report that President Donald Trump has reviewed a new Iranian proposal aimed at de-escalating the ongoing bilateral conflict, but Washington remains dissatisfied with its terms. According to statements from White House and State Department representatives, the proposal seeks to postpone negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program until after maritime disputes and regional shipping conflicts in the Persian Gulf are resolved.
U.S. leadership has consistently maintained that addressing Tehran’s nuclear activities is a non-negotiable priority and must be tackled at the outset of any diplomatic framework. Officials indicated that deferring these discussions to focus on maritime security and freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz does not align with Washington’s core requirements. The administration continues to evaluate the proposal while emphasizing that security guarantees and nuclear compliance remain central to any potential agreement.
The diplomatic exchange occurs amid heightened tensions and an active military standoff that has disrupted regional trade routes. Iranian diplomatic representatives have characterized the situation as an illegal campaign involving a naval blockade, while U.S. officials have framed the dispute around maritime security and strategic deterrence. Diplomatic channels remain strained, with recent reports noting canceled high-level envoy visits and parallel diplomatic engagements by Iranian officials across the region.
Despite the current impasse, both sides continue to engage through indirect channels. Washington has reiterated its commitment to reviewing the Iranian framework, though the fundamental disagreement over the sequencing of nuclear versus maritime negotiations presents a significant obstacle to immediate de-escalation.
Read the original reporting at ToloNews →
Reliability assessment
Two independent outlets corroborate the core event: the US is reviewing Iran's proposal to end the conflict, and US officials express dissatisfaction due to the proposal's deferral of nuclear talks. Multiple named public figures (Trump, Rubio, Leavitt, Valdes, Iravani) provide on-record statements. Differing details regarding specific spokespersons and supplementary diplomatic movements do not undermine the strong corroboration of the central diplomatic standoff.
The source language reads straight.
Independent web corroboration
A separate web search returned 8 matching reports. A selection:
Officials had planned discuss Trump’s options for moving ahead, including whether or not to resume the US bombing campaign that’s on hold after the president extended a ceasefire last week. Trump has appeared hesitant in public on reviving the conflict.
- Iran offers to reopen Strait of Hormuz if U.S. lifts its blockade and the war ends, officials saypbs.org
U.S. President Donald Trump seems unlikely to accept the offer, which was passed to the Americans by Pakistan and would leave unresolved the disagreements that led the U.S. and Israel to go to war on Feb.
WASHINGTON, April 27 (Reuters) - A U.S. official said on Monday that President Donald Trump is unhappy with an Iranian proposal because it did not address Iran's nuclear program.
The meeting may be ongoing, Leavitt said around 1:23 p.m. ET, but the proposal was being discussed. I don't want to get ahead of the president or his national security team. What I will reiterate is that the president's red lines with respect to Iran have been made very, very clear.
Across the newsrooms
Where reports agree
- Iran presented a new diplomatic proposal to the US to end the conflict.
- The proposal seeks to delay nuclear program discussions until after resolving Persian Gulf maritime/shipping disputes.
- US leadership is dissatisfied with the proposal due to the postponement of nuclear talks.
- The US insists nuclear issues are a non-negotiable priority/red line.
- Ongoing US-Iran tensions are severely impacting regional maritime security and diplomatic progress.
Where reports differ
- Framing of the conflict: ToloNews cites Iran's UN representative explicitly calling it an 'illegal war' launched by the US and Israel on Feb 28 with a naval blockade, while Khaama Press refers to it more generally as a 'two-month conflict' focused on diplomatic and trade implications.
- Cited US officials differ: Khaama Press quotes Olivia Valdes, while ToloNews quotes White House spokesperson Caroline Leavitt and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, though all convey the same US stance.
- Supplementary diplomatic details: Khaama Press reports Trump canceled envoy visits to Islamabad and notes Iranian FM Araghchi's regional travel, which ToloNews omits.
Filed by 2 outlets
ToloNews
Originating
Reported straight
Reported straight
Khaama Press
Reported straight
Reported straight
Filed under
International — US-Iran Relations, Donald Trump, Persian Gulf Security, Nuclear Negotiations, Regional Diplomacy
Spotted an error or have more on this story? Tip the desk on Telegram → or WhatsApp →.
Reader supported
Keep Ehtebar running
Every published story uses paid tools to translate reporting, compare sources, extract claims, and produce a clearer read on Afghanistan. Reader support helps keep that work independent.
€5
helps cover daily verification runs
€15
supports a week of source comparison
€50
keeps independent analysis moving
More in International

Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan Ambassador Meets UNHCR Official on Afghan Migrants
— Reliable

Iranian Parliament Speaker Qalibaf Warns US of Different Iran
— Reliable

US Plans to Deport Afghan and Syrian Migrants to Central African Republic
— Reliable

83 U.S. Lawmakers Urge Halt to Afghan Refugee Relocation From Qatar to Congo
— Reliable