
Conflicting Statements Mark Expiration of Iran-US Ceasefire
A 14-day ceasefire between Iran and the United States, which began on April 8, reached its scheduled expiration early Thursday amid conflicting statements regarding its status and duration. Iranian state television reported that the truce ended at 3:30 a.m. Thursday, Tehran time. Pakistan, which has been mediating between the two nations, stated the ceasefire concluded at 23:50 GMT, approximately 3:20 a.m. in Tehran.
In contrast, U.S. President Donald Trump asserted that the agreement had been extended until Thursday evening in Washington, D.C. The discrepancy in timelines highlights ongoing diplomatic uncertainty as both sides weigh their next steps. Iran’s Foreign Ministry indicated it has not yet reached a final decision on whether to participate in U.S.-Iran peace negotiations hosted in Pakistan.
Military rhetoric has also intensified alongside the diplomatic developments. President Trump warned that he anticipates a resumption of airstrikes if hostilities continue. Conversely, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf stated that Tehran possesses undisclosed military capabilities, signaling readiness for potential escalation.
The expiration of the truce leaves the region in a period of heightened uncertainty, with official channels in both Washington and Tehran offering divergent accounts of the ceasefire’s current standing. As mediators work to clarify the diplomatic framework, both governments continue to issue public statements that underscore the fragile nature of the recent de-escalation efforts.
Know more about this story?
If you have additional information or believe something is inaccurate, let us know. Your tips help us stay accurate.
Sources (1)
More in International

The Durand Line: Historical Context and International Legal Perspectives

Iran's Participation in Islamabad Peace Talks Remains Unconfirmed Amid Rising Tensions

Russian Publication Urges Broader Afghan Policy Amid Border Tensions and Project Delays

HRW Researcher Urges EU to Prioritize Rights Over Migration Deals With Taliban
ReliableThe Durand Line: Historical Context and International Legal Perspectives
The Durand Line, established in 1893, is increasingly viewed through international legal frameworks as a recognized boundary rather than a disputed territory. Historical Afghan political discourse has heavily emphasized the border and Pashtunistan, contrasting with minimal state attention given to other territorial adjustments.
ReliableIran's Participation in Islamabad Peace Talks Remains Unconfirmed Amid Rising Tensions
Iran has not confirmed its attendance at upcoming peace talks in Islamabad, mediated by Pakistan, as a ceasefire expires and tensions rise over a seized tanker and the partial closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
ReliableRussian Publication Urges Broader Afghan Policy Amid Border Tensions and Project Delays
A Russian publication aligned with the Foreign Ministry has urged Moscow to diversify its Afghanistan policy beyond the Taliban, citing stalled infrastructure projects and escalating border clashes with Pakistan. The analysis highlights ongoing diplomatic and trade ties alongside conflicting casualty reports from the recent conflict.
ReliableHRW Researcher Urges EU to Prioritize Rights Over Migration Deals With Taliban
A Human Rights Watch researcher has urged the European Union to prioritize human rights over migration control agreements with the Taliban regarding the deportation of Afghan refugees. The statement follows reports on the vulnerable conditions of recent returnees and news of an upcoming Taliban delegation to Brussels.