
HRW Researcher Urges EU to Prioritize Rights Over Migration Deals With Taliban
Fereshteh Abbasi, an Afghanistan researcher at Human Rights Watch, has called on European Union member states to refrain from basing the deportation of Afghan refugees on agreements with the Taliban. Abbasi emphasized that migration control policies should not override fundamental human rights, particularly given the ongoing security and humanitarian challenges inside Afghanistan.
The warning comes amid reports that a Taliban delegation is scheduled to visit Brussels in the coming weeks to discuss the return of Afghan migrants. Abbasi stated that any framework for repatriation must be grounded in international protection standards rather than political arrangements with the de facto authorities.
Concerns regarding the conditions of returning Afghans have been echoed by the International Organization for Migration. According to the agency, thousands of individuals recently returned from Pakistan are experiencing severe exhaustion, heightened vulnerability, and psychological distress. The organization noted that these returnees require immediate humanitarian assistance and long-term support to navigate the difficult transition.
Advocacy groups and international observers have consistently highlighted the risks associated with forced or accelerated returns, particularly for women, children, and individuals with documented protection needs. Abbasi reiterated that European nations must ensure robust screening processes and uphold their legal obligations to asylum seekers before proceeding with any repatriation initiatives.
The planned diplomatic engagement in Brussels underscores the growing international focus on migration management and the status of Afghan nationals abroad. As discussions continue, human rights organizations maintain that the safety and dignity of refugees must remain the central priority in any cross-border migration policy.
Know more about this story?
If you have additional information or believe something is inaccurate, let us know. Your tips help us stay accurate.
Sources (1)
More in International

The Durand Line: Historical Context and International Legal Perspectives

Conflicting Statements Mark Expiration of Iran-US Ceasefire

Iran's Participation in Islamabad Peace Talks Remains Unconfirmed Amid Rising Tensions

Russian Publication Urges Broader Afghan Policy Amid Border Tensions and Project Delays
ReliableThe Durand Line: Historical Context and International Legal Perspectives
The Durand Line, established in 1893, is increasingly viewed through international legal frameworks as a recognized boundary rather than a disputed territory. Historical Afghan political discourse has heavily emphasized the border and Pashtunistan, contrasting with minimal state attention given to other territorial adjustments.
ReliableConflicting Statements Mark Expiration of Iran-US Ceasefire
Conflicting statements from U.S. and Iranian officials mark the expiration of a 14-day ceasefire, with Tehran and Pakistan citing an early Thursday end while Washington claims an extension. Military warnings and undecided peace talks underscore ongoing diplomatic uncertainty.
ReliableIran's Participation in Islamabad Peace Talks Remains Unconfirmed Amid Rising Tensions
Iran has not confirmed its attendance at upcoming peace talks in Islamabad, mediated by Pakistan, as a ceasefire expires and tensions rise over a seized tanker and the partial closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
ReliableRussian Publication Urges Broader Afghan Policy Amid Border Tensions and Project Delays
A Russian publication aligned with the Foreign Ministry has urged Moscow to diversify its Afghanistan policy beyond the Taliban, citing stalled infrastructure projects and escalating border clashes with Pakistan. The analysis highlights ongoing diplomatic and trade ties alongside conflicting casualty reports from the recent conflict.