INTERNATIONAL — May 21, 2026

India Criticizes Pakistan Over Afghan Civilian Casualties at UN Security Council

India's UN representative accused Pakistan of causing hundreds of civilian deaths in Afghanistan through airstrikes, including one on a Kabul drug treatment center that killed 269 people. Pakistan rejected the claims, saying its actions targeted terrorists.

The Ehtebar Desk — originates with ToloNews — corroborated by Pajhwok and Afghanistan International2 min read

India Criticizes Pakistan Over Afghan Civilian Casualties at UN Security Council
Image courtesy ToloNews

India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations criticized Pakistan during a Security Council session for causing civilian casualties in Afghanistan through cross-border attacks.

Harish Parvathaneni told the council that Pakistani forces were responsible for approximately 770 civilian deaths and 720 injuries in the first three months of the year, with most incidents attributed to airstrikes. He specifically referenced a strike in mid-March on the Omid drug treatment hospital in Kabul during Ramadan, which killed 269 civilians and injured 122 others according to UNAMA.

The envoy accused Pakistan of ignoring calls from the UN Secretary-General to protect civilians, including Afghan refugees, and of disregarding international obligations.

Pakistan rejected the accusations, stating that its operations targeted terrorist sites and did not hit civilians or civilian infrastructure.

Separate reports indicated that around 750 civilians were killed or wounded in such attacks over the same period, with strikes affecting mosques, hospitals, schools, and clinics. UN humanitarian officials and Afghan political analysts condemned the incidents as violations of international law and urged dialogue to prevent further harm to civilians and regional stability.

Read the original reporting at ToloNews

Reliability assessment

3 independent sources corroborate the core event of the Indian envoy's on-record UNSC statements accusing Pakistan of civilian casualties, with direct attribution to named representative and UNAMA references. Minor variations in casualty numbers are normal reporting discrepancies and do not affect verification of the speech or incident occurrence.

The source language mixes facts with framing or advocacy wording. Afghanistan International: "hypocrisy" in adhering to the principles of international law; "deadly airstrike"; the selective emphasis on Pakistani actions while framing continued civilian casualties and attacks on hospitals and schools as "worrying" attributes responsibility in a value-laden manner.; Pajhwok: "martyred", "deadliest of these attacks", "ignored the UN Secretary-General’s call" — these phrases introduce emotional or judgmental framing by using martyrdom language for casualties, superlatives for attacks, and accusatory verbs against Pakistan.; ToloNews: "sharp reaction", "strongly criticized", "hypocrisy", "martyrs people" – these phrases frame Pakistan's actions with moral condemnation and emotional judgment while presenting the Indian and UN positions as authoritative.

Across the newsrooms

Where reports agree

  • India's UN representative publicly criticized Pakistan at the UN Security Council for airstrikes and attacks causing Afghan civilian casualties, specifically referencing the Omid drug treatment center in Kabul.
  • The Omid attack occurred during Ramadan after Taraweeh prayers.
  • Pakistan's actions were described as violating international obligations to protect civilians.
  • References to UNAMA findings on civilian casualties attributed to Pakistani forces.

Where reports differ

  • Casualty figures for the Omid attack: 269 killed/122 injured (UNAMA per Sources 1 and 2) vs. over 400 deaths/250 injuries (Source 2 report).
  • Total civilian casualties from Pakistani attacks in first three months: ~770 killed and 720 injured (Source 2) vs. 750 killed or wounded (Source 3).
  • Name of Indian representative reported as Harish Parvataneni/Parvathaneni vs. Pratapuri (Source 3).

Filed by 3 outlets

Filed under

InternationalUN Security Council, Pakistan airstrikes, Civilian casualties, Omid clinic, India

Spotted an error or have more on this story? Tip the desk on Telegram → or WhatsApp →.

Reader supported

Keep Ehtebar running

Every published story uses paid tools to translate reporting, compare sources, extract claims, and produce a clearer read on Afghanistan. Reader support helps keep that work independent.

€5

helps cover daily verification runs

€15

supports a week of source comparison

€50

keeps independent analysis moving